Browse

Latest Headlines

Fresh headlines, crisp visuals — faster reading.

Lupita Nyong'o Opens Up About Fibroid Battle: Surgery Dilemma Returns

Lupita Nyong'o Opens Up About Fibroid Battle: Surgery Dilemma Returns

Lupita Nyong’o has been dealing with uterine fibroids for decades, and she recently revealed that the condition has worsened over time. She first underwent surgery to remove fibroids in her 20s and now faces a resurgence of symptoms. Lupita Nyong’o's Fibroid Experience Nyong’o was diagnosed with fibroids in her early 20s and had surgery to remove them at age 23. During the procedure, doctors removed 30 fibroids of various sizes from her uterus. Recently, she disclosed dealing with the return of these growths, now numbering 50. Nyong’o has not yet decided between undergoing another surgical procedure or coping with ongoing symptoms such as pain and bleeding. Her options include a myomectomy or a hysterectomy, both offering different risks and benefits. Treatment Options for Fibroids A myomectomy can be chosen by women wanting to preserve fertility. It involves removing fibroids while keeping the uterus intact. However, there is a risk of fibroids returning since the uterus remains. In contrast, a hysterectomy offers a permanent solution by removing the uterus, but it is generally recommended for those who do not plan to have children. Both surgeries carry risks of complications such as bleeding and infection. The Recurrence of Fibroids Many factors can influence why fibroids recur after being surgically removed. Common types like intramural and submucosal fibroids may particularly have high recurrence rates. Monitoring is advised for those who have had prior myomectomies. Women experiencing heavy or prolonged menstrual cycles, pelvic pain, or lower back pain should consult with their doctor about treatment options for fibroids. Prompt discussion can help explore less invasive solutions before fibroids become more severe.

Mar 13, 2026
Judge Rebukes Trump Team Over AI Excuse in Public Health Funding Cuts

Judge Rebukes Trump Team Over AI Excuse in Public Health Funding Cuts

A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from cutting $600 million in public health grants to four states, calling the action likely unlawful. Legal Battle Over Funding Cuts Illinois, along with California, Colorado, and Minnesota, filed a lawsuit against the administration for targeting them due to their policies. Judge Manish S. Shah issued a temporary restraining order shortly after the case began. The judge ruled that the funding cuts had more to do with political retaliation than public health concerns. The lawsuit cites violations of the Administrative Procedure Act. Background of the Case President Trump had announced in January that states with sanctuary cities would lose federal funding. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Health and Human Services (HHS) were involved in executing this plan. The Centers for Disease Control compiled a list of affected states, suggesting coordination with Trump's announcement. Later explanations for grant terminations were described as lacking reasoned decision-making. Court's Findings Judge Shah found the justifications for defunding "contrived" and noted an AI model was used to create language supporting these cuts, which did not align with agency priorities. The court concluded that there was significant inference of OMB's influence on HHS decisions, raising questions about overarching directives targeting specific states for fund cuts.

Mar 13, 2026